Boolean Circuit Lower Bounds
نویسندگان
چکیده
The lectures are devoted to boolean circuit lower bounds. We consider circuits with gates ∧,∨,¬. Suppose L ∈ {0, 1}∗ is a language. Let Ln = L∩{0, 1}. We say that L is computed by a family of circuits C1, C2, . . . if on an input x = (x1, . . . , xn), Cn(x) is 1 when x ∈ Ln and is 0 when x / ∈ Ln. For a circuit C, we define size(C) to be the number of edges in the graph representing C, and depth(C) to be the length of the longest path from an input to the output. We say that L ∈ P/poly if there exists a family C1, C2, . . . computing L such that size(Cn) = n O(1). It is easy to see that if a Turing machine computes L in time T (n), then there exists a family of circuits C1, C2, . . . computing L so that size(Cn) ≤ (T (n))2. If a Turing machine is given a circuit C and an input x, then it can compute C(x) in time size(C). However, there exist languages that are computable by families of circuits but are not computable by Turing machines. The simplest example is L = Halting problem, Cn(x) = 1 iff L(n) = 1 for |x| = n. But in some sense, this is not an interesting example.
منابع مشابه
Circuit Complexity and Multiplicative Complexity of Boolean Functions
In this note, we use lower bounds on Boolean multiplicative complexity to prove lower bounds on Boolean circuit complexity. We give a very simple proof of a 7n/3− c lower bound on the circuit complexity of a large class of functions representable by high degree polynomials over GF(2). The key idea of the proof is a circuit complexity measure assigning different weights to XOR and AND gates.
متن کاملTighter Connections between Derandomization and Circuit Lower Bounds
We tighten the connections between circuit lower bounds and derandomization for each of the following three types of derandomization: general derandomization of promise-BPP (connected to Boolean circuits), derandomization of Polynomial Identity Testing (PIT) over fixed finite fields (connected to arithmetic circuit lower bounds over the same field), and derandomization of PIT over the integers ...
متن کاملCircuit Lower Bounds, Help Functions, and the Remote Point Problem
We investigate the power of Algebraic Branching Programs (ABPs) augmented with help polynomials, and constant-depth Boolean circuits augmented with help functions. We relate the problem of proving explicit lower bounds in both these models to the Remote Point Problem (introduced in [3]). More precisely, proving lower bounds for ABPs with help polynomials is related to the Remote Point Problem w...
متن کاملIkenmeyer C, Komarath B, Lenzen C, Lysikov V, Mokhov A, Sreenivasaiah K.
The problem of constructing hazard-free Boolean circuits dates back to the 1940s and is an important problem in circuit design. Our main lower-bound result unconditionally shows the existence of functions whose circuit complexity is polynomially bounded while every hazardfree implementation is provably of exponential size. Previous lower bounds on the hazard-free complexity were only valid for ...
متن کاملReasons for Hardness in Quantified Boolean Formulas
We aim to understand inherent reasons for lower bounds for QBF proof systems, and revisit and compare two previous approaches in this direction. The first of these relates size lower bounds for strong QBF Frege systems to circuit lower bounds via strategy extraction (Beyersdorff & Pich, LICS’16). Here we show a refined version of strategy extraction and thereby for any QBF proof system obtain a...
متن کاملProof Complexity Lower Bounds from Algebraic Circuit Complexity
We give upper and lower bounds on the power of subsystems of the Ideal Proof System (IPS), the algebraic proof system recently proposed by Grochow and Pitassi [GP14], where the circuits comprising the proof come from various restricted algebraic circuit classes. This mimics an established research direction in the boolean setting for subsystems of Extended Frege proofs, where proof-lines are ci...
متن کامل